Chapter 7 of A Quantitative Picture of Contemporary Japanese Families

Women’s attitudes on caring for elderly parents

Life-stage differences between an “ideal incident” and a “daily incident” in terms of care
KADO Yoku
(Nihon University)
A Quantitative Picture of Contemporary Japanese Families: Tradition and Modernity in the 21st Century (Tohoku University Press) (2013-03-28)
Title: Women’s attitudes on caring for elderly parents: Life-stage differences between an “ideal incident” and a “daily incident” in terms of care
Author: KADO Yoku (角 能)
Page: 175–192
Short URL: http://tsigeto.info/qfam/book/7

Abstract

Chapter 7. Women’s attitudes on caring for elderly parents - Life-stage differences between an “ideal incident” and a “daily incident” in terms of care

  1. 1. Data and perspectives
  2. 2. Reexamination of previous studies and theoretical discussion
  3. 3. Methods and variables
    1. 3.1. Dependent variables
    2. 3.2. Independent variables and hypotheses
      1. 3.2.1. Independent Variables Related to the Structures in Practice
      2. 3.2.2. Independent Variables Related to Resource Allocation
      3. 3.2.3. Independent Variables Related to the Norm Structure
  4. 4. Results
  5. 5. Discussion

Keywords

Tables

Table 1–4

References

  1. [Cooke 2006] Cooke, Lynn Prince, 2006, “Policy Preferences and Patriarchy: The Division of Domestic Labour in East Germany, West Germany and the United States,”Social Politics, 13(1): 117–43.
  2. [Ehara 2001] 江原由美子, 2001, 『ジェンダー秩序』勁草書房.
  3. [Finch and Groves 1983] Finch, J. and Groves, D., 1983, Labour and Love: Women, Work and Caring, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  4. [Funabashi 2006] 舩橋恵子, 2006, 『育児のジェンダーポリティックス』勁草書房.
  5. [Iguchi 2007] 井口高志, 2007, 『認知症家族介護を生きる：新しい認知症ケア時代の臨床社会学』東信堂.
  6. [Kasuga 2001] 春日キスヨ, 2001, 『介護問題の社会学』岩波書店.
  7. [Kido 2010] 木戸功, 2010, 『概念としての家族：家族社会学のニッチと構築主義』新曜社.
  8. [Kikuzawa 2007] 菊澤佐江子, 2007, 「女性の介護：ライフコース視点からの考察」『福祉社会学研究』 4: 99–119.
  9. [Morioka 1993] 森岡清美, 1993 『現代家族変動論』ミネルヴァ書房.
  10. [Nakagawa 2004] 中川敦, 2004, 「遠距離介護と親子の居住実態：家族規範との言説的な交渉に注目して」『家族社会学研究』 15(2): 89–99.
  11. [Nakanishi 2009] 中西泰子, 2009, 『若者の介護意識：親子関係とジェンダー不均衡』勁草書房.
  12. [Nishimura 2006] 西村真弓, 2006, 「介護が就業形態の選択に与える影響」『季刊家計経済研究』 70: 53–61.
  13. [Ochiai 1994] 落合恵美子, 1994, 『21 世紀家族へ』有斐閣.
  14. [Ojima 2000] 尾嶋史章, 2000, 「『理念』から『日常』へ：変容する性別役割分業意識」盛山和夫編『日本の階層システム 4 ：ジェンダー・市場・家族』東京大学出版会, 217–36.
  15. [Sarasa 2008] Sarasa, Sebastian, 2008, “Do Welfare Benefits Affect Women’s Choices of Adult Care Giving?,” European Sociological Review, 24(1): 37–51.
  16. [Sasatani 1999] 笹谷春美, 1999, 「家族ケアリングをめぐるジェンダー関係」『講座社会学14：ジェンダー』東京大学出版会, 213–48.
  17. [Ungerson 1987] Ungerson, Clare, 1987, Policy Is Personal: Sex, Gender and Informal Care, Tavistock Publications. （＝ 1999, 平岡公一・平岡佐智子, trans., 『ジェンダーと家族介護：政府の政策と個人の生活』光生館. ）
  18. [Yamada 1994] 山田昌弘, 1994, 『近代家族のゆくえ』新曜社.
  19. [Yamane 2010] 山根純佳, 2010, 『なぜ女性はケア労働をするのか：性別分業の再生産を超えて』岩波書店.
  20. [Yamato 1995] 大和礼子, 1995, 「性別役割分業意識の二つの次元」『ソシオロジ』40(1): 109–26.
  21. [Yamato 2010] 大和礼子, 2010, 「日常的援助における性別役割分業にもとづく双系と系譜における父系の併存：現代日本における高齢者−成人子関係についての文献レビューから」『関西大学社会学部紀要』42(1): 35–76.

Note

The data for this secondary analysis, National Family Research of Japan 2008 {NFRJ08} by the NFRJ Committee, Japan Society of Family Sociology, was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo. An earlier version of this chapter was published as a Japanese paper in the NFRJ08 Second Report (田渕六郎・嶋崎尚子編, 2011, 『世代間関係の動態』日本家族社会学会 全国家族調査委員会, 65–82 {nfrj:nfrj08_201102_4}).

Communication

Questions/comments are welcome. Send your message to the editor via:

Tohoku University / Faculty of Arts and Letters / Applied Japanese Linguistics / TANAKA Sigeto / Family Change in an Aging Society with Low Fertility / Book

History of this page:

This page contains Japanese characters encoded in accordance with MS-Kanji: "Shift JIS".

Generated 2014-01-10 17:37 +0900 with Plain2.

Copyright (c) 2013, 2014 TANAKA Sigeto