The origin of a chart indicating the likelihood of conception linearly declining with age

- a literature survey
TANAKA Sigeto <http://tsigeto.info>
(Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University)
Unpublished manuscript (2017-06-12)

[PDF Full-text] [SocArXiv preprint] [On Academia.edu]

[Communication] [Links]



URI: http://tsigeto.info/17m
OSF project: {DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/7TKND}

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A chart indicating the likelihood of conception linearly declining with age (86% for women aged 20-24, 78% for 25-29, 63% for 30-34, 52% for 35-39, 36% for 40-44, 5% for 45-49, and 0% for 50 and over) is widely used on Internet fertility sites and by medical professionals. Its origin has been unknown until now.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the origin of the chart.
METHODS: A literature survey.
RESULTS: Among the seven points on the curve, three are based on data that are not the likelihood of conception, while four are probably derived from oversimplified description of fecundability estimates for Hutterite and Taiwanese women in the 1950s and 1960s. Two professionals contributed to the making of these data.
CONCLUSIONS: The chart was fabricated and exaggerates the effect of age on the likelihood of conception. At least two professionals are responsible for the fabrication.
CONTRIBUTION: This paper describes a case of misinformation about demographers' research results. It issues a warning against misuse of demographic knowledge in medical, commercial, educational, and political contexts.

Keywords

fecundability, natural fertility, popular science, misinformation, research ethics, fabrication, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive medicine, demography

Contents

  1. The Chart in Question
  2. Tracing the Origin
  3. Read the Figures as Fecundability
  4. Evaluation

Tables and Figures

References

  1. BabyCenter, 2007, "Chart: The effect of age on fertility," (Retrieved {http://web.archive.org/web/20070827115714/http://www.babycenter.com/0_chart-the-effect-of-age-on-fertility_6155.bc})
  2. Baird, D. D., 2013, "Women's fecundability and factors affecting it," M. B. Goldman, R. Troisi, and K. M. Rexrode eds., Women and health (2nd ed), London: Academic Press, 193-207. {ISBN:978-0-12-384978-6}
  3. Bendel, J. P., 1978, "A model of births for developing countries and its use in the study of demographic effect of birth control" (PhD thesis), Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University. (UMI Dissertation Services; 7814379) {NCID:BA8994655X}
  4. Bendel, J. P and C. I. Hua, 1978, "An estimate of the natural fecundability ratio curve," Social Biology, 25(3): 210-27. {doi:10.1080/19485565.1978.9988340}
  5. Bongaarts, J. and R. G. Potter, 1983, Fertility, biology, and behavior. New York: Academic Press. {ISBN:0-12-114380-5}
  6. Carcio, H. A., 1998, "Causes of infertility," H. A. Carcio ed., Management of the infertile woman, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 25-48. {ISBN:0-7817-1044-8}
  7. Coale, A. J. and T. J. Trussell, 1974, "Model fertility schedules," Population Index, 40(2): 185-258. {doi:10.2307/2733910}
  8. Colombo, B. and G. Masarotto, 2000, "Daily fecundability," Demographic Research, 3(5). {doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.5}
  9. Epigee, 2005, "Infertility and conception," Charlottesville: Terwilliger-Epigee. (Retrieved {http://web.archive.org/web/20050603084414/http://www.epigee.org/health/infertility.html})
  10. Fassbender, I., 2016, Enhancing autonomy in reproductive decisions?: Education about family planning and fertility as a countermeasure against the low birthrate," Contemporary Japan, 28(2): 123-44 . {doi:10.1515/cj-2016-0007}
  11. Findeklee, S., L. Lotz, K. Heusinger, I. Hoffmann, R. Dittrich, and M. W. Beckmann, 2015, "Fertility protection in female oncology patients: How should patients be counseled?," Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkundem, 75(12): 1243-9. {doi:10.1055/s-0035-1558184}
  12. Henry, L., 1961, "Some data on natural fertility," Eugenics Quarterly, 8(2): 81-91. {doi:10.1080/19485565.1961.9987465}
  13. Henry, L., 1965, "French statistical research in natural fertility," M. C. Sheps and J. C. Ridley eds., Public health and population change, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 333-50. {NCID:BA2884173X}
  14. Jain, A. K., 1969, "Fecundability and its relation to age in a sample of Taiwanese women," Population Studies, 23(1): 69-85. {doi:10.1080/00324728.1969.10406029}
  15. James, W. H., 1979, "The causes of the decline in fecundability with age," Social Biology, 26(4): 330-4. {doi:10.1080/19485565.1979.9988390}
  16. Khatamee, M. A., 1988, "Infertility: a preventable epidemic?," International Journal of Fertility, 33(4): 246-51. {pmid:2902038}
  17. Menken, J. and U. Larsen, 1986, "Fertility rates and aging," L. Mastroianni and C. A. Paulsen eds., Aging, reproduction, and the climacteric, New York: Plenum Press, 147-66. {ISBN:0-306-42142-9}
  18. Menken, J., J. Trussell, and U. Larsen, 1986, "Age and infertility," Science, 233: 1389-94. {doi:10.1126/science.3755843}
  19. Muller, A., R. Dittrich, C. E. Reissmann, D. Kronawitter, M.W. Beckmann, and P. G. Oppelt, 2009, "Rationelle Diagnostik in der gynakologischen Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin - Teil 2: Besondere Aspekte der Sterilitatsdiagnostik," Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 69(7): R67-R88. {doi:10.1055/s-0029-1185816}
  20. Phillips, K. and J. Grifo, 2016, The whole life fertility plan, New York:William Morrow. {ISBN:978-0-06-242981-0}
  21. Rosenthal, M. S., 1996, The fertility sourcebook, Los Angeles: Lowell House. {ISBN:1-56565-455-2}
  22. Rosenthal, M. S., 1998, The fertility sourcebook (2nd ed.), Los Angeles: Lowell House. {ISBN:1-56565-866-3}
  23. Rosenthal, M. S., 2002, The fertility sourcebook (3rd ed.), Chicago: Contemporary Books. {ISBN:0-7373-0380-8}
  24. Sheps, M. C., 1965, "An analysis of reproductive patterns in an American isolate," Population Studies, 19(1): 65-80. {doi:10.1080/00324728.1965.10406005}
  25. Speroff, L. and M. A. Fritz, 2005, Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility (7th ed.), Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. {ISBN:0-7817-4795-3}
  26. Tanaka S., 2017, "Works citing Bendel and Hua on natural fecundability: A literature review on the origin of a falsified chart used in high school education in Japan," Annual Reports of Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, 66: 142-128. (Retrieved {http://hdl.handle.net/10097/00107733})
  27. Tanaka S., forthcoming, "Another science war: Fictitious evidence on women's fertility and the 'egg aging' panic in 2010s Japan," Advances in Gender Research, 24. {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/series/agr}
  28. Vincent, P., 1950, "La sterilite physiologique des populations," Population, 5(1): 45-64. {doi:10.2307/1523911}
  29. Yamagata Z., 2013, Bosi hoken zigyou no koukateki zissi no tame no ninpu kensin, nyuuyouzi kensin d?ta no rikatuyou ni kansuru kenkyuu (MHLW Grants Report; 201219019A). Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare ({https://mhlw-grants.niph.go.jp/niph/search/NIDD00.do?resrchNum=201219019A})

Acknowledgements

Findings in this article were partly presented at a symposium on academic ethics held by an activist network (November 30, 2015 in Tokyo), at a symposium held by the Science Council of Japan (June 18, 2016 in Tokyo), and at the 26th annual conference of the Japan Society of Family Sociology (September 11, 2016 in Tokyo). The author thanks to comments from the participants (additional information is on http://tsigeto.info/misconduct/). The author also thanks Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.


Communication

Questions/comments are welcome.


Related sites and pages

[PDF Full-text] [OSF (SocArXiv) preprint] [On Academia.edu]


Tohoku Univ / School of Arts and Letters / Applied Japanese Linguistics / TANAKA Sigeto


History of this page:


Generated 2017-06-22 15:35 +0900 with Plain2.

Copyright (c) 2017 TANAKA Sigeto